|
|
Pricing shown below is delayed, please note the timestamp at the bottom. Real time pricing is available via MBS Live.
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Pricing as of 4:08 PM EST |
10s moved 3bps lower from 230pm to 3pm and have extended those gains about another bp in the after-hours session. MBS are mostly just passengers on that ride, not experiencing the same pace of reversal, but conversely, not having sold off quite as much as Treasuries earlier in the day. Fannie 3.0’s are back to 104-03, essentially in line with their highs of the day.
Whereas negative reprice risk was more of an issue earlier, now we’d lean toward positive reprice risk with the month-end storm weathered in Treasuries and prices continuing to hold steady. That said, we think NO reprice is more likely than a reprice in either direction–simply erring a bit on the positive side currently, vs negative previously.
The risk is that we’ve simply entered a trend of weaker prices into the close. One could certainly get that impression based on the highs and lows in play since this morning. So we’d advocate keeping a close eye on on each instance of new lows for MBS. Every time we tick down to a new low, there’s more an more evidence of this negative trend persisting.
Negative reprices risk is already somewhat present at current levels, but if Fannie 3.0s don’t soon break back over 103-31 or 10yr yields below 1.495, risks could increase into the afternoon.
This is the sort of movement that we might not even note on another day, but we’re cognizant of the fact that higher prices prevailed into the rate sheet hours when 3.0s were around 104-04.
We’re not especially concerned about the prospect of negative reprices at the moment, but did want to let you know that markets were doing something besides completely flat-lining into the afternoon. Volume is low enough that the recent mini-spike could even be attributable to lunch-time in New York.
Whatever the case, it seems clear that there’s no major determination for big swings ahead of tomorrow’s FOMC and Thursday’s ECB announcements. We’d keep an eye on 103-29 in Fannie 3.0s as the most noticeable line in the sand for negative reprice risk.
More from MND:
If you have trouble viewing this email, you can read the full post at http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/mortgage_rates/blog/269197.aspx
You were sent this email because you opted to receive email alerts when a new article was published to this Mortgage News Daily channel. To adjust your email settings:
Manage Your Email
Unsubscribe from all Email Communications
Mortgage Rates continued their bounce back from abrupt weakness on Friday. The two days of gains so far this week bring rates back within striking distance of all-time lows ahead of several key events in the coming days. Markets have essentially shifted their focus to these events: the FOMC Announcement tomorrow and perhaps an even more important announcement from Europe’s Central Bank on Thursday, followed by the important Employment Situation Report on Friday.
With those events on the horizon, markets mostly drifted sideways during business hours today, but had improved enough in the overnight session (“improved” in this case, referring to lower interest rates in bond markets) to get that sideways slide started off in better territory. Most lenders offered increased rebates or decreased closing costs for the prevailing Best-Execution rate of 3.5%.
(Read More:What is A Best-Execution Mortgage Rate?)
Tomorrow begins 3 days that could drastically change the state of mortgage rate environment. As with any such event, we’d note that “COULD” is the operative word. There’s never a guarantee that a big ticket event WILL necessarily do much of anything to interest rates. So all we can do is make note of certain events that have a lot of POTENTIAL energy.
Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday see three such events. Tomorrow brings the Fed Rate Decision (or FOMC Announcement). Some market participants expect the text of the statement to change significantly and possible even to include mention of a different time frame than the recent “late 2014” verbiage. Others think the Fed might announce additional stimulus efforts specifically targeted at the mortgage market, while a majority feel that they will hold off on drastic changes until at least the September meeting.
In short, the more the Fed says to directly target Mortgage-Backed-Securities (MBS), the better it could be for mortgage rates. Even the skeptics who aren’t holding their breath for anything significant tomorrow are still assuming there will be some evolution of verbiage. That sets up the risk that whatever verbiage arrives, might not be “enough” for bond markets, which could lead to afternoon weakness, but we’ll just have to evaluate those possibilities as they arise. If mortgage rates are at risk of a mid-day price change following the FOMC announcement, it’s unlikely that you’d have time to coordinate a quick enough lock to beat the reprice unless you specifically coordinated this with your mortgage professional. In that sense, it’s mostly a decision you’ll need to make before the event itself.
Long Term Guidance: We’d continue to advocate against trying to “get ahead” of current market movements due to the high degree of uncertainty. In the past, we would have interpreted that advice as a suggestion to lock, but in the recently “low and sideways” environment, it’s probably better-read as a suggestion to go with the flow of gradually lower rates until we see the pattern definitively break. It’s a reasonably safe assumption that European concerns will generally continue to apply downward pressure on rates although there are no guarantees that the right piece of news or economic event couldn’t mark “the turning point” at which rates bottom out. On any given day, rates have been at or near all-time lows and in the grand scheme of things, unable to move lower as quickly as Treasuries for example. So although there is potential gain from floating, it’s still a historically excellent time to lock if you’d prefer to take the risk off the table.
Loan Originator Perspectives
Kent Mikkola, Mortgage Loan Originator, NMLS 353976
Remember to take into consideration the following points when considering to lock: 1. How long til you close – If you only have 15 days til you anticipate closing, there isn’t a lot of time to make up any potential losses that could occur. 2. Does the lender offer a float down/renegotiation of your locked rate – If you can float down a locked rate, you are protected from rate increases and significant rate decreases. Speak with your originator in regard to other facets to consider before locking in.
Victor Burek at Benchmark Mortgage
Most of the losses from Friday’s mini sell off have been recouped, but lender pricing is still lagging. As always, lenders take away much quicker than they pass along improvements. I favor floating all loans overnight, but be prepared to lock tomorrow. High risk events coming later this week.
Today’s BEST-EXECUTION Rates
Ongoing Lock/Float Considerations
More from MND:
If you have trouble viewing this email, you can read the full post at http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/consumer_rates/269201.aspx
You were sent this email because you opted to receive email alerts when a new article was published to this Mortgage News Daily channel. To adjust your email settings:
Manage Your Email
Unsubscribe from all Email Communications
Freddie Mac said today that it would be opening up refinance opportunities to borrowers who are not underwater on their existing Freddie Mac mortgages. Under the company’s Relief Refinance Mortgage Program which includes the Home Affordable Refinance Program (HARP 2.0) the requirements for refinancing mortgages with loan-to-value ratios at or under 80 percent will be brought in line with those with LTVs over 80 percent, the target audience for HARP 2.0 loans.
The alignment will involve eliminating many of the representation and warranty requirements that exist on the mortgages being refinanced. It is hoped this will act as an incentive to lenders to promote the loans. Freddie Mac said it is further evaluating the Relief Refinance program, specifically looking at the Open Access offering to determine the best way to reach eligible borrowers and assist lenders in managing capacity. Open Access is designed to promote competition so that borrowers can obtain Relief Refinance Mortgages including HARP 2.0 from lenders other the one associated with their existing servicer.
Freddie Mac will announce details of the program changes by mid-September and they will go into effect for loans delivered after January 1, 2013. The changes are based on lender feedback on HARP 2.0 which was rolled out starting last fall
Paul Mullings, Senior Vice President and Interim Head of Single Family at Freddie Mac said, “Once implemented the changes will give lenders a new measure of certainty and ease when they help borrowers with Freddie Mac owned- or guaranteed- mortgages take advantage of today’s historically low mortgage rates. This will help us build on the success of the HARP 2.0 and Relief Refinance Mortgage programs of helping more than 1.3 million Freddie Mac borrowers. Today’s announcement further underscores Freddie Mac’s vital role in making affordable mortgage financing available to America’s homeowners and future homebuyers.”
More from MND:
If you have trouble viewing this email, you can read the full post at http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/07312012_gse_refinancing.asp
You were sent this email because you opted to receive email alerts when a new article was published to this Mortgage News Daily channel. To adjust your email settings:
Manage Your Email
Unsubscribe from all Email Communications
Edward J. DeMarco, Acting Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency today again stated his opposition to allowing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to participate in the Principal Reduction Alternative (PRA) of the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). DeMarco’s agency which acts as conservator for the two government sponsored enterprises (GSEs) has opposed principal reduction on the part of the two companies despite growing pressure from Congress and the Department of the Treasury.
In a letter to the Chair and Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs DeMarco rebuffed an offer to use funds from the Toxic Asset Relief Program (TARP) to assist borrowers and said, “After much study, I have concluded the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s adoption of HAMP PRA would not make a meaningful improvement in reducing foreclosures in a cost effective way for taxpayers.” He went on to say there are continued improvements that can be made to the GSEs loss mitigation and borrower assistance efforts, specifically naming the further streamlining of refinance opportunities, enhancing the short sale process, and reducing lender uncertainty that could inhibit new lending.
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner told DeMarco in a letter released to the media that he was concerned about the regulator’s continued opposition and urged the acting director to reconsider his decision. The Secretary said “I do not believe it is the best decision for the country because, as we have discussed many times, the use of targeted principal reduction by the GSEs would provide much needed help to a significant number of troubled homeowners, help repair the nation’s housing market, and result in a net benefit to taxpayers.
Geithner called FHFA’s numbers “selective” and said that the agency’s own analysis which it had shared with Treasury “has shown that permitting the GSE’s to participate in the program could help up to half a million homeowners and save the GSEs $3.6 billion compared to standard loan modifications. GSE participation, he said, would save taxpayers as much as $1 billion on a net basis.
Geithner’s letter was accompanied by a five page memorandum in which Treasury staff lays out their case for principal reduction.
There has been increasing friction between the Obama Administration and DeMarco over his handling of the conservatorships. DeMarco, a holdover from the Bush Administration, has been acting director since 2009 because the Senate refused to bring the current president’s nominee to the floor for a vote. Administration insiders have blamed DeMarco for thwarting many of the president’s housing initiatives and there has been a spate of on-line petitions organized by progressive political groups calling for DeMarco’s resignation.
In his letter DeMarco restated his conviction that principal reduction would not support his agency’s prime obligation as conservator; to preserve the assets of the GSEs on behalf of taxpayers. He said that the result of adopting the HAMP PRA for the GSEs could result in benefits that could be either positive or negative for taxpayers but any model-projected benefits could be offset by a number of costs and risks including the implementation costs for the GSEs and the servicers, opportunity costs, long term implications of weakening the reliability of the mortgage contract, and delayed resolution of ongoing modification negotiations.
Tomorrow we will take a detailed look at the justifications laid out by DeMarco and Geithner for their differing viewpoints and no doubt here reactions from the administration and members of Congress.
More from MND:
If you have trouble viewing this email, you can read the full post at http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/07312012_principal_reduction_demarco.asp
You were sent this email because you opted to receive email alerts when a new article was published to this Mortgage News Daily channel. To adjust your email settings:
Manage Your Email
Unsubscribe from all Email Communications
Commercial and multi-family mortgage lending rose in the second quarter of 2012 due, the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) said, to low interest rates and continued stabilization and growth in the commercial real estate markets. The volume of mortgage originations was up 39 percent from the first quarter of this year and 25 percent compared to lending one year earlier.
The MBA’s Quarterly Survey of Commercial/Multifamily Mortgage Bankers Originations noted increased lending from every major investor group it surveys. Commercial banks saw the largest annual increase at 58 percent while on a quarterly basis the index rose from 158 to 172. Lending on the part of the two government sponsored enterprises (GSEs) Fannie Mae and Freddie May increased from 157 to 201 quarter to quarter; this was 50 percent above the lending one year earlier. Conduit (Commercial mortgage-backed securities) lending nearly quadrupled from the first to the second quarter (23 to 94) but was up only 16 percent over the Q2 2011 figure. The final investor group, life insurance companies, increased from an index of 220 in Q1 to 302 in Q2 but was up only 10 percent on an annual basis.
The quarter-over-quarter growth was driven by increases in lending for hotel and office properties, up 147 percent and 66 percent respectively. Multifamily lending had the smallest quarterly increase, 21 percent. There were also increases of 47 percent for industrial properties, 33 percent for health care facilities, and 29 percent for retail.
Multifamily lending increased 19 percent year-over-year while retail lending was up 56 percent, hotels properties 22 percent, office properties 15 percent and health care properties 11 percent. Loans for industrial properties fell five percent.
The average size of a multi-family loan in the second quarter of 2012 was $12.2 million compared to $14.2 million the previous quarter and $14.3 million in the second quarter of 2011. The average size of a loan from the GSEs was $12.7 million compared to $14.2 million the previous quarter and $12.2 million in Q2 2011.
More from MND:
If you have trouble viewing this email, you can read the full post at http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/07312012_cre_multifamily_mortgages.asp
You were sent this email because you opted to receive email alerts when a new article was published to this Mortgage News Daily channel. To adjust your email settings:
Manage Your Email
Unsubscribe from all Email Communications
Pricing shown below is delayed, please note the timestamp at the bottom. Real time pricing is available via MBS Live.
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Pricing as of 11:08 AM EST |
The same theme continues to play out in the domestic session where 10yr yields have essentially held between 1.47 and 1.48 all morning despite S&P futures chopping between 1383 and 1378, not to mention the advancing Euro.
We can probably credit much of this resilient determination in bond markets to a simple game of follow-the-leader with German Bunds. As is the case most mornings, they’ve been tightly connected and Bunds are drawing additional strength on overnight news that an ESM Banking license isn’t even being considered. This was one of the possibilities for Thursday’s ECB announcement, and although we’d never assume that something is true in the Euro zone simply because one person/party/organization says it is, it’s still a net positive for bond markets.
The domestic economic data has just now passed without a trace in bond markets and the same theme of “choppier equities by comparison” is ongoing after S&Ps hit their lows of the morning following Consumer Confidence.
All of the above leaves MBS in great shape vs yesterday and arguably terrific shape vs the more disconcerting moments late last week. Fannie 3.0’s are up 4 ticks on the day and have made it back to the 104-00 handle, even if only just. Fannie 3.5’s are also back over 106-00, currently up 2 ticks at 106-02.
There’s no more significant scheduled economic data today though that’s no guarantee of calm movements. Markets have a lot to consider ahead of the impending central bank meetings/announcements, as well as Friday’s NFP. In addition, today is “month-end” which can create a fair amount of trading motivation in its own right. Thankfully, that motivation tends to err on the side of positivity for bond markets, all other things being equal.
The monthly Consumer Confidence Survey®, based on a probability-design random sample, is conducted for The Conference Board by Nielsen, a leading global provider of information and analytics around what consumers buy and watch. The cutoff date for the preliminary results was July 19.
Says Lynn Franco, Director of Economic Indicators at The Conference Board: “Despite this month’s improvement in confidence, the overall Index remains at historically low levels. Consumers’ attitude regarding current conditions was little changed in July, but their short-term expectations, which had declined last month, bounced back. However, while consumers expressed greater optimism about short-term business and employment prospects, they have grown more pessimistic about their earnings. Given the current economic environment — in particular the weak labor market — consumer confidence is not likely to gain any significant momentum in the coming months.”
The Chicago Purchasing Managers reported the ]uly Chicago Business Barometer gained incrementally while the short- term trend of the Chicago Business Barometer fell for the fourth month. Gains in New Orders and Order Backlogs were offset by weakness in Production, Employment and Supplier Deliveries. The three month moving average on all Business Activity indexes fell in ]uly.
BUSINESS ACTIVITY!
– EMPLOYMENT Index continued to grow at a slow pace;
– NEW ORDERS recovered mildly from ]une’s 33 month low;
– ORDER BACKLOGS moved from contraction to expansion.
With May’s data, we found that home prices fell annually by 1.0% for the 10-City Composite and by 0.7% for the 20-City Composite versus May 2011. Both Composites and 17 of the 20 MSAs saw increases in annual returns in May compared to April. Boston, Charlotte and Detroit were the three cities that saw their annual returns worsen in May, with annual rates of -0.1%, +0.9% and +0.6%, respectively. Atlanta continues to be the only city posting a double-digit negative annual return with -14.5%. However, this is an improvement over the -17.0% annual decline recorded in April 2012. All 20 cities and both Composites posted positive monthly returns. No cities posted new lows in May 2012.
“With May’s data, we saw a continuing trend of rising home prices for the spring,” says David M. Blitzer, Chairman of the Index Committee at S&P Dow Jones Indices. “On a monthly basis, all 20 cities and both Composites posted positive returns and 17 of those cities saw those rates of change increase compared to what was observed for April. Seventeen of the 20 cities and both Composites also saw improved annual rates of return. We have observed two consecutive months of increasing home prices and overall improvements in monthly and annual returns; however, we need to remember that spring and early summer are seasonally strong buying months so this trend must continue throughout the summer and into the fall.
Personal income increased $61.8 billion, or 0.5 percent, and disposable personal income (DPI) increased $52.4 billion, or 0.4 percent, in June, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Personal consumption expenditures (PCE) decreased $1.3 billion, or less than 0.1 percent. In May, personal income increased $39.0 billion, or 0.3 percent, DPI increased $31.7 billion, or 0.3 percent, and PCE decreased $13.3 billion, or 0.1 percent, based on revised estimates.
Real disposable income increased 0.3 percent in June, compared with an increase of 0.5 percent in May. Real PCE decreased 0.1 percent, in contrast to an increase of 0.1 percent.
More from MND:
If you have trouble viewing this email, you can read the full post at http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/mortgage_rates/blog/269135.aspx
You were sent this email because you opted to receive email alerts when a new article was published to this Mortgage News Daily channel. To adjust your email settings:
Manage Your Email
Unsubscribe from all Email Communications
The home price picture showed further improvement with the release this morning of the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices (HPI) for May. Both the 10-City and the 20-City composite indices increased by 2.2 percent compared to April and, while the numbers were still lower than one year earlier, the difference was substantially smaller than in April.
The May 2012 number for the 10-City Composite was -1.0 percent compared to a year earlier and for the 20-City it was -0.7. In April the year-over-year changes were -2.2 percent and -1.9 percent respectively and those numbers had, in turn, been a substantial improvement over those in March.
To provide some perspective on the indices, the 10 and 20-City Composite numbers for May 2012 were 151.79 and 138.96 compared to May 2011 when they were 153.93 and 139.88. The two composites hit and sustained peak numbers through most of 2006 within a few decimal places of 226.0 and 206.0 respectively. Measured from the peaks during this period both composites are down about 35 percent. As of May, average home prices nationally are back to the levels of Spring 2003 for the 10-City Composite and the summer of that year for the 20-City. The base of 100 for the indices was set in January 2000.
All 20 of the MSAs covered by the indices saw positive monthly returns in May and 17 had increased annual returns in May compared to April. Only Boston, Charlotte, and Detroit declined and each by less than 1 percent. Atlanta continues to be the only city posting a double-digit annual negative return, declining 14.5 percent. Even that is an improvement over the 17.0 percent drop reported in April.
“With May’s data, we saw a continuing trend of rising home prices for the spring,” David M. Blitzer, Chairman of the Index Committee at S&P Dow Jones Indices said. “On a monthly basis, all 20 cities and both Composites posted positive returns and 17 of those cities saw those rates of change increase compared to what was observed for April. We have observed two consecutive months of increasing home prices and overall improvements in monthly and annual returns; however, we need to remember that spring and early summer are seasonally strong buying months so this trend must continue throughout the summer and into the fall.”
Some of the cities hardest hit by foreclosures and price declines seem to be roaring back. Phoenix again had the best annual return with home prices up 11.5 percent from one year earlier. Prices are still half what they were at their 2006 but they have been increasing steadily for the last five months. Miami and Tampa are two other hard-hit Sunbelt cities that are now showing positive annual rates of change. Even Las Vegas, which topped the list of cities with the most foreclosure filings for over four years, posted a positive monthly change in May and an improvement in its annual numbers.
Blitzer said that while many reports for June including new home sales, housing starts, and mortgage default rates were mixed all had improved on an annual basis. “The housing market seems to be stabilizing, but we are definitely in a wait-and-see mode for the next few months.”
More from MND:
If you have trouble viewing this email, you can read the full post at http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/07312012_home_prices.asp
You were sent this email because you opted to receive email alerts when a new article was published to this Mortgage News Daily channel. To adjust your email settings:
Manage Your Email
Unsubscribe from all Email Communications
In mortgage banking, just like gymnastics, you have to get up after you fall down.
Totaling through May, California (133,000), Florida (92,000), Michigan (60,000), Texas (58,000), and Georgia (57,000) accounted for nearly half (400,000) of the completed foreclosures in the entire country during the last 12 months. The foreclosures in May brought the 12 month total to 819,000 foreclosures which is an average of 2,440 each day. Since the financial crisis began in September 2008 there have been approximately 3.5 million completed foreclosures across the nation and, as of the end of May, another 1.4 million homes were in the national foreclosure inventory, down from 1.5 million in May 2011, but still 3.4 percent of all homes with a mortgage. Though the national foreclosure inventory levels remain steady, there have been dramatic shifts at the state level with foreclosure inventories in most states are declining, but foreclosure inventory is still rising in many judicial states. The five states with the most completed foreclosures are also the top states in terms of their foreclosure inventory. Four of the five states, Nevada being the exception, use primarily a judicial foreclosure process which has been blamed for much of the backlog of loans that are severely delinquent but not yet foreclosed.
“Rob, here we are in the mortgage business. Congress is gunning for us, the CFPB is gunning for us, the public is gunning for us, and the press is gunning for us. Everyone is upset about all the compliance, rules, and regulations that have been put in place. Yet, volumes are through the roof, margins are high, and many companies are ‘going gangbusters.’ How am I supposed to complain about the cost of doing business when this is happening?” That is a good question. It seems like it is a dirty little secret that mortgage companies, in general as I am sure that there are exceptions, are very profitable right now. Remember, however, that a portion of this money is a) due to less competition, b) servicing value fluctuations, and c) companies increasing margins to reserve against future liabilities, litigation, and buybacks. But yes, from a money perspective it is a good time to be a mortgage origination company, and the government & regulators continue to install hurdles against new companies.
Where are the loans coming from? Many borrowers can’t take advantage of these incredibly low mortgage rates due to negative equity, strict underwriting, and originator backlogs. The only thing that can really extend refi activity in a low rate environment is a loosening of underwriting or documentation or appraisal standards to bring more borrowers into the market, something that isn’t likely to happen anytime soon. Twice this year the market did see a surge in refinancing, with the expanded the Home Affordable Refinance Program for borrowers who owe more on their mortgages than their homes are worth and the FHA changing the rules on its streamline refi program for borrowers who already have FHA loans, dropping underwriting almost entirely. Some LO’s tell me that most of the activity in recent months are from the same borrowers who refinanced a year or so ago refinancing again. While programs like HARP and FHA’s Streamlined Refi can provide a temporary surge in refi’s, especially for banks, they still only account for a relatively small share of borrowers.
Non-bank lenders are often confused as to whether or not they will be subjected to CFPB scrutiny. They will be, just as several non-banks are being audited. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s Office of Fair Lending and Equal Opportunity released expectations for non-banks concerning compliance with fair lending and unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices (“UDAAP”) laws. The Bureau intends to create a level playing field between banks and non-banks, but CFPB representatives have indicated that they understand that fair lending programs take time to develop and that they will need to help educate executive and senior management at non-banks concerning the importance of fair lending laws and the risks of non-compliance. As a result, the CFPB does not expect to find fully developed and implemented fair lending programs in place at non-banks during the initial examination cycle and recognizes that such programs will evolve. Nonetheless, non-banks will be expected to quickly develop and maintain fair lending programs that are comparable to those at banks. Similarly, it is expected that UDAAP programs will evolve for both banks and non-banks as the CFPB continues to define “abusive” practices through examinations and enforcement actions. Fair lending risk assessments will continue to be required for banks and are expected for non-banks. One issue that continues to garner discussion among both banks and non-banks is the presence of enforcement attorneys in examination meetings throughout the examination process. The Bureau understands that both banks and non-banks will want to have their attorneys present if CFPB enforcement attorneys attend compliance examination meetings. The CFPB would not object to the presence of in-house or outside counsel for financial institutions at these meetings so long as such attorneys are not acting in a manner that obstructs the examination process reports law firm BuckleySandler LLP.
When in doubt, attend training or a conference! Seriously, the training and conference calendar is important to know, as are relatively recent investor/agency updates to give one a flavor for trends in the industry.
The Community Mortgage Lenders of America (CMLA) represents nearly 90 mid-sized community bankers and mortgage bankers from throughout every major metropolitan region throughout the country. The CMLA is holding its Annual General Session and Business Meeting this Sunday, August 5. The General Session will feature a presentation from Christopher Lombardo – Assistant Regional Director of the CFPB’s Midwest Region. The CMLA is determined to establish sustainable business and regulatory strategies to support community based lending, competition and consumer advocacy while fighting policies that would increase concentration in the marketplace among the nation’s largest financial institutions. To learn more about the CMLA, please visit www.thecmla.com or contact Kevin Cuff, Executive Director, at kmcuff@thecmla .com.
FinCen’s August 13th is fast approaching and with it, the new requirement for Anti-Money Laundering policies for Mortgage Bankers and Brokers. Barbara Werth is hosting a free webinar on Anti-Money Laundering policies on August 1st from 1-2PM CST. There is no cost of the webinar, and anyone interested should email Barbara at: barb@MTToday .co so she can send you call-in information.
Fannie is offering its servicers free loss mitigation training under the Know Your Options Customer CARE initiative. The training complies with the Single Point of Contact Standards set forth by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau as well as the FHFA’s Alignment Initiative. See the Know Your Options website for more information.
On August 14th in Boise, ID, the FHA will host a realtor training session in the local HUD Field Office. The event will cover topics such as FHA updates, rehabilitation loans, Energy Efficient mortgage programs, and selling HUD-owned properties. Interested parties can register here.
A full-day training on FHA appraisals will be held in Little Rock, Arkansas on August 22nd. The session will cover appraisal protocol, updates to FHA appraisal policy, and property eligibility and is suitable for both new and experienced FHA appraisers. Register here.
On August 23rd, the FHA will be hosting “A Day with the FHA,” an event that will cover a number of fields relevant to those who work with the organization. Policy updates, refinances, and REO calculations are all on the agenda. Registration info is available here.
Who says that there are no new investors? Norcom Mortgage, one of the fastest growing non-bank lenders on the East Coast, is launching a correspondent program. It will focus on high quality credit unions, banks, and select mortgage companies. Effective immediately, Vice President’s Patti White and Susan Sheffer will be leading the correspondent team’s expansion efforts on the East Coast. (Norcom is a FHLMC seller/servicer and a GNMA issuer.)
Under its “Just Miss” program, Mid America Mortgage is offering clients the option of having MAM purchase closed FHA-, VA-, and USDA-insured loans that aren’t able to be sold in the traditional manner due to “just missing” investor guidelines. To qualify for the program, loans must be RESPA-compliant and insured with MIC, LGC, or LNG.
Turning to merger and acquisition and closure news, West Virginia’s WesBanco will buy Pennsylvania’s Fidelity Bancorp for $70.8mm million in cash and stock, or about 1.62x tangible book. New York Private B&T, the parent company for Emigrant Savings Bank, has reached agreement to sell 30 branches and $3.2B in deposits to Apple Bank for Savings ($8.4B, NY) for an undisclosed sum. This is the largest branch transaction of 2012 and the largest in the New York City area in over 10 years. KeyCorp said it will close 5% of its branches (about 50) in an effort to reduce expenses by $150mm to $200mm. And Bank of America continues to sell branches in smaller “noncore” markets with populations of less than 150k people or MSAs with less than 500k people, as it works to close 750 branches over the next few years.
To improve performance, Iberiabank ($11.7B, LA) said it will close 10 underperforming branches. Keefe, Bruyette & Woods announced that Mission Bancorp, the Bakersfield-based parent holding company for Mission Bank, has entered an agreement with Mojave Desert Bank whereby it will acquire the latter’s branches in Mojave, Ridgecrest, Lancaster, and Helendale.
Osage Bancshares announced their agreement for Osage to be acquired for an aggregate value of $27.4 million by American Heritage Bank through a merger transaction.
Capital One will pay $12 million to military customers to settle charges from the DOJ and OCC that it improperly foreclosed on them and overcharged for credit card and auto loans.
A few weeks ago Stonegate Mortgage released its 2nd Quarter results that were of note. Its revenues year-to-date had increased 340% over 2011, servicing portfolio increased by 235%, and its correspondent channel has grown 519% over 2011. The Indianapolis-based company was recognized last month by Indianapolis Business Journal as the 9th fastest growing privately held company in the city. “At Stonegate, we are always focused on the next few years ahead and that includes expanding into more states, increasing originations in our wholesale and correspondent channels, expanding our retail branch network through acquisitions, building our servicing portfolio and brand awareness,” said Jim Cutillo, CEO of Stonegate Mortgage. In March Long Ridge Equity Partners, a New York based private equity firm invested $25 million in Stonegate Mortgage to support the company’s continued growth and further acquisitions.
Monday – another summer day in the fixed-income markets. There was little news over the weekend and nothing here in the United States. Demand for agency mortgage-backed securities was steady, and supply from originators dropped off a little. But where the heck did July go? Anyway, by the end of the day the U.S. T-note closed at 1.50% and MBS prices were better by about .125-.375, depending on coupon.
Today, however, we have a heckuvalot of data, along with the start of a 2-day Fed meeting. (The Fed announcement is tomorrow, but don’t look for a lot of change in their statement.) We’ve had Personal Income and Consumption, unchanged and +.5% respectively. Although pretty much on target, the numbers are somewhat disappointing for the economy given that consumer spending drives growth. No spending = no growth. The Employment Cost Index was on target. 9AM offers May’s S&P/Case Shiller home price index (+0.4 vs. +0.7 last – but there is always a two month delay in this number), 9:45AM EST has July’s Chicago PMI (52.4 vs. 52.9 previously), and 10AM EST we’ll have July’s Consumer Confidence (less so at 61.4. vs. 62.0). Early on the 10-yr is at 1.46% and MBS prices are again better by .125-.250.
RETIRE WHERE? Here are some of your choices – I keep receiving them from readers, part 7 of 7:
You can retire to the Deep South where…
1. You can rent a movie and buy bait in the same store.
2. “Y’all” is singular and “all y’all” is plural.
3. “He needed killin” is a valid defense.
4. Everyone has 2 first names: Billy Bob, Jimmy Bob, Mary Sue, Betty Jean, Mary Beth, etc.
5. Everything is either “in yonder,” “over yonder” or “out yonder” It’s important to know the difference, too.
OR
You can retire to Colorado where…
1. You carry your $3,000 mountain bike atop your $500 car.
2. You tell your husband to pick up Granola on his way home and so he stops at the day care center.
3. A pass does not involve a football or dating.
4. The top of your head is bald, but you still have a pony tail.
More from MND:
If you have trouble viewing this email, you can read the full post at http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/channels/pipelinepress/07312012-cfpb-and-non-banks-cmla.aspx
You were sent this email because you opted to receive email alerts when a new article was published to this Mortgage News Daily channel. To adjust your email settings:
Manage Your Email
Unsubscribe from all Email Communications
The pace of foreclosure activity in the U.S. remained unchanged in June with 60,000 completed foreclosures, the same number as in May but 25 percent lower than the June 2011 total of 80,000. The number of pending foreclosures was also unchanged from May at 1.4 million homes or 3.4 percent of all homes with a mortgage and the year-over-year change was a single basis point decrease from 3.5 percent. There were 1.5 million homes in the inventory a year earlier. The foreclosure inventory represents the share of mortgages homes that are in some stage of foreclosure.
These figures were reported on Tuesday by CoreLogic in its National Foreclosure Report for June. The company said that there have now been approximately 3.7 million completed foreclosures since the financial crisis began in September 2008.
“While completed foreclosures and real-estate owned (REO) sales virtually offset each other over the past four months, producing static levels of foreclosure inventory for most of this year, they are beginning to diverge again,” Mark Fleming, chief economist for CoreLogic said. “Over the last two months REO sales declined while completed foreclosures leveled out. So we could see foreclosure inventory rising going forward.”
“The decline in the flow of completed foreclosures to pre-financial crisis levels is more welcome news pointing to an emerging housing market recovery,” according to Anand Nallathambi, CoreLogic’s president and CEO. “However, we believe even more can be done to reduce the inventory of foreclosures by decreasing the level of regulatory uncertainty and expanding alternatives to foreclosure.”
On a state level there continue to be distinct differences between states using a judicial foreclosure process and those which do not. The foreclosure inventory decreased or was unchanged on an annual basis in 24 of the 27 non-judicial foreclosure states (including Washington, DC) and in the three states where the rate increased the changes were 0.2 percent or less. In the 24 judicial foreclosure states the rate increased in 10 in a range from 0.2 to 1.3 percent. Over the past year the ratio of completed foreclosures to mortgages in the U.S. was 1 in 52.
The highest number of foreclosures over the 12 month period ending in June were in California (125,000), Florida (91,000), Michigan (58,000), Texas (56,000), and Georgia (55,000.) These five states account for nearly half of all completed foreclosures in the country.
On a percentage basis the foreclosure inventory was highest in Florida (11.5 percent), New Jersey (6.5 percent), New York (5.1 percent), Illinois (5.0 percent), and Nevada (4.8 percent.)
More from MND:
If you have trouble viewing this email, you can read the full post at http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/07312012_delinquencies_foreclosures.asp
You were sent this email because you opted to receive email alerts when a new article was published to this Mortgage News Daily channel. To adjust your email settings:
Manage Your Email
Unsubscribe from all Email Communications